Skip to content

Follow one package from prequalification to award.

Tower B MEP works at Waterfront District, from the approved list to the award letter, as the developer's procurement team sees it.

8 chapters, about 3 minutes

Chapters marked Enterprise show Enterprise features.

Step 1 of 3

Prequalify Enterprise

Prequalification, MEP Submitted
Bidder 2
Standard Vendor Questionnaire
19 of 19 answered
Section Status
1. Company Information Complete
2. Financials Complete
3. Technical Capability Complete
4. Certifications & Licences Complete
5. Experience & References Complete
6. Compliance & Declarations Complete

Suppliers apply once, on your own form.

Suppliers prequalify through your own form, not a fresh spreadsheet for every tender. This one starts from the Standard Vendor Questionnaire: six sections, 19 questions.

Grading, MEP: Bidder 2 Tier 1
Criterion Weight Score
Financial 25% 82
Technical 25% 88
Experience 25% 86
Compliance 25% 80
Weighted score 84.0, Tier 1
Tier 1: 80+ Tier 2: 65+ Tier 3: 50+ Tier 4: below 50

Grade them by trade.

Each application is graded for its trade on a weighted matrix. Here: Financial, Technical, Experience and Compliance, weighted equally. 80 and above is Tier 1, 65 Tier 2, 50 Tier 3, and below that Tier 4.

Approved list, MEP 6 selected
Bidder 1
Valid to Mar 2027
Tier 1
Bidder 2
Valid to Jan 2027
Tier 1
Bidder 3
Valid to Jun 2027
Tier 2
Bidder 4
Valid to Apr 2027
Tier 1
Bidder 5
Valid to Feb 2027
Tier 2
Bidder 6
Renewed, valid to May 2027
Tier 2
Bidder 7
Renewal due in 21 days
Tier 3
Invite 6 to Tower B, MEP works

Invite from the approved list.

Approved suppliers go on your list for the trade, and renewal rounds keep it current. When Tower B's MEP package is ready, you pick the six bidders from that list.

  • Renewal reminders keep each approved supplier's documents current.
  • There's an approved list for each trade.
  • Start from the Standard Vendor Questionnaire and the Standard Vendor Grading matrix, or use your own form. Get the templates
  • Prequalification is on the Enterprise plan.

Issue

Tower B, MEP works Draft
Package Detail
Specification, MEP, Rev A PDF, 4.2 MB
Drawings M-100 to M-148, Rev A 49 sheets
Bill of quantities, Rev A 412 items
Envelopes Technical, Commercial
Bidders, from the MEP approved list 6
Bids close Thu 8 Oct, 14:00

One version of everything.

Documents, drawings and the BoQ go out together as one version, to the six bidders you picked. Bids come back in two envelopes: technical and commercial.

Company tender rules Set by your company
Rule This package
Two envelopes, technical and commercial Applied
Minimum bidders: 5 6 invited
Anonymous evaluation On
Set once for the company. Applied to every tender.

Enterprise

Your company's rules, already applied.

Rules your company sets once are enforced on every tender: envelopes, a minimum number of bidders, anonymous evaluation. Nobody has to remember them package by package.

Issue: Tower B, MEP works Approval, 2 steps
Project procurement lead
Requested, Mon 14 Sep 09:04
Requested
1. Commercial manager
Mon 14 Sep 11:20
Approved
2. Head of procurement
Mon 14 Sep 14:02
Approved
Issued to 6 bidders
Mon 14 Sep 14:02, Rev A
Open

Enterprise

Approved, then issued.

Issuing goes through named approvers in the order you set. The final approval issues the package, to all six bidders at once.

  • Approval workflows are on the Enterprise plan. Approvers can be named people or groups.
  • Every request, approver and decision is logged with the time.
  • Import the BoQ from Excel.
  • Enforced company rules are on the Enterprise plan.

Clarify

Clarifications, MEP works Clarifications
Question from a bidder, Thu 24 Sep 09:40
Is the chiller plant in scope for this package?
Yes. See Addendum 2, section 4.3.
Answered Mon 28 Sep 11:20
Sent to All 6 bidders
Bidders see The question and the answer, not who asked

Answer once. Every bidder gets it.

Bidders ask in the tender, not by email or phone. You answer once, and all six get the same answer without seeing who asked.

Addendum 2, Mon 28 Sep Rev C current
Specification, MEP Rev B to Rev C
Drawings M-120 to M-126 Rev B to Rev C
Acknowledged 6 of 6
Bidder 1 12:05 Bidder 2 12:31 Bidder 3 13:10 Bidder 4 15:42 Bidder 5 16:08 Bidder 6 17:20

An addendum is a new revision.

Addendum 2 issues Rev C to every bidder at the same time. Each one acknowledges it, so you know everyone is pricing the same documents.

  • Rev B is replaced for every bidder at once, so nobody prices an old drawing.
  • Invited bidders see the same documents and answers as each other.
  • Questions, answers and addenda stay with the tender, on the record.

Bid

Your bid: Tower B, MEP works Bidder view
BoQ item Qty Rate Amount
3.1 Chillers 4 nr 162,125.00 648,500
3.2 Pumps 10 nr 7,990.00 79,900
3.3 Ductwork 2,500 m² 83.90 209,750
3.4 Controls 1 item 96,800.00 96,800
3.5 Testing and commissioning 1 item 35,500.00 35,500
Priced 412 of 412 items Free to bid

The contractor prices your BoQ.

This is the bidder's side. The contractor prices your BoQ line by line, online, so every bid comes back in your structure. Bidding is always free.

Your bid: submit Bidder view
Technical envelope 3 files
Method statement.pdf Uploaded
Programme.pdf Uploaded
Team and experience.pdf Uploaded
Commercial envelope
BoQ, 412 of 412 items priced 4.18m
Price encrypted with this tender's own key
Submitted 6 Oct 16:40 Closes 8 Oct, 14:00

Sealed when it's submitted.

They upload the technical documents and submit. The price is encrypted with a key unique to this tender. Bids close at the deadline you set, here Thu 8 Oct at 14:00.

Bids received Closed 8 Oct, 14:00
Bidder Submitted Price
Bidder 1 5 Oct 09:12 Sealed
Bidder 2 6 Oct 16:40 Sealed
Bidder 3 7 Oct 11:05 Sealed
Bidder 4 7 Oct 17:30 Sealed
Bidder 5 8 Oct 10:48 Sealed
Bidder 6 Not submitted –
5 of 6 submitted Prices open 12 Oct, 10:00

Back on your side: 5 of 6 in.

You see who has submitted, and when. The prices stay sealed until the opening you scheduled.

  • Bidders never pay to accept an invitation or to bid.
  • One free profile works for every developer that invites them.
  • The key belongs to this tender only, never shared with another.

Open

Technical evaluation Locked 12 Oct, 09:41
Bidder Technical score
Bidder 1 81.0
Bidder 2 88.1
Bidder 3 70.4
Bidder 4 72.6
Bidder 5 52.5
5 of 5 evaluators, blind to price
Commercial envelopes Sealed until 10:00:00

Technical first, then locked.

Before any price is seen, the committee scores the technical envelopes. Their scores lock at 09:41. The commercial envelopes stay sealed until 10:00.

Commercial opening, 12 Oct Scheduled 10:00:00
Bidder Envelope Price
Bidder 1 Sealed Opened Sealed 3.96m
Bidder 2 Sealed Opened Sealed 4.18m
Bidder 3 Sealed Opened Sealed 4.62m
Bidder 4 Sealed Opened Sealed 4.40m
Bidder 5 Sealed Opened Sealed 3.71m

Opening log

  1. Opening started, 5 envelopes
  2. Bidder 1 opened
  3. Bidder 2 opened
  4. Bidder 3 opened
  5. Bidder 4 opened
  6. Bidder 5 opened
  7. 5 of 5 opened
Technical scores locked first, at 09:41

10:00:00. The envelopes open.

At the scheduled opening, the commercial envelopes decrypt one after another, and each one is stamped in the opening log. No one on the tender, including your own team, can see a price before the opening you scheduled.

Opening record, MEP works On the record
8 Oct 14:00 Bids closed, 5 of 6 submitted
12 Oct 09:41 Technical scores locked, 5 of 5 evaluators
12 Oct 10:00:00 Commercial envelopes opened, at the scheduled time
12 Oct 10:12 Evaluation supervisor viewed the comparison
Prices as opened
Bidder 1 3.96m Bidder 2 4.18m Bidder 3 4.62m Bidder 4 4.40m Bidder 5 3.71m

The opening, on the record.

The record shows when bids closed, when the technical scores were locked, and when each envelope opened. When the board asks whether anyone saw prices early, this is the answer.

  • Prices open only at the time you set.
  • Technical evaluators score without seeing any price.
  • Every view after the opening goes on the record too.
  • How sealed bids stay sealed: Security

Compare

Bid comparison, BoQ section 3 Best green highest orange
BoQ item Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Bidder 3 Bidder 4 Bidder 5
3.1 Chillers 612,000 648,500 701,200 655,000 590,400
3.2 Pumps 88,400 79,900 92,300 86,100 83,700
3 more lines

Every line, side by side.

All five bids sit on your own BoQ, so each line compares like for like. The best rate on each line shows green, the highest orange.

3.4 Controls, against the median (99,200) 2 lines to check
3.3 Ductwork: Bidder 3 left it unpriced.
3.4 Controls: Bidder 5 at 41,000, against 96,800 to 112,000 from the others.

Spot what's missing or too low.

Bidder 3 left the ductwork unpriced. Bidder 5's controls price is less than half of anyone else's. Both show up before you award, not after.

Bid comparison, totals Export to Excel
Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Bidder 3 Bidder 4 Bidder 5
Lines not priced 0 0 1 0 0
Bid total 3.96m 4.18m 4.62m 4.40m 3.71m
MEP works, bid comparison.xlsx Every line, every bid

Totals, then Excel.

Totals sit under the lines they come from. Export the whole comparison to Excel for anyone who wants it in their own spreadsheet.

  • Compare every section, down to the single BoQ item.
  • Import the BoQ from Excel at the start; export comparisons and registers at the end.
  • The lowest total isn't always the best bid. The next chapter shows how the scores combine.

Evaluate

Technical evaluation: Bid B Names hidden
Criterion Weight Score
Method statement 30% 90
Programme 20% 85
Team and experience 30% 88
Health and safety 20% 88.5
Weighted technical score 88.1
Anonymous evaluation: Bid A to Bid E 5 of 5 evaluators

Enterprise

The committee scores the technical envelope.

Each evaluator scores against weighted criteria agreed before bids arrived. With anonymous evaluation (Enterprise) on, they see Bid A to Bid E, never a company name.

Combined result Technical 60%, commercial 40%
Bidder Tech. Comm. Combined
Bidder 2 88.1 88.8 88.4
Bidder 1 81.0 93.7 86.1
Bidder 4 72.6 84.3 77.3
Bidder 3 70.4 80.3 74.4
Bidder 5 52.5 100.0 71.5

One combined result.

Technical and commercial scores combine on the weights you set, here 60% technical and 40% commercial. Bidder 2 isn't the cheapest, and the result shows why it leads.

Evaluation pack, MEP works Ready for the board
Evaluation pack.pdf 13 Oct, 15:30
Contents
Scores by criterion and evaluator Included
Evaluators' comments Included
Line-by-line comparison Included
Combined result, 60% / 40% Included

The pack for the board.

The evaluation pack puts the scores, the evaluators' comments and the comparison in one document, ready for the board.

  • Committee evaluation starts on the Pro plan.
  • Anonymous evaluation is on the Enterprise plan.
  • Technical evaluators score without seeing a price.
  • Import evaluation matrices from Excel.

Approve and award

Award: Tower B, MEP works Step 2 of 2
Recommended
Combined 88.4, price 4.18m
Bidder 2
Design review
Drawings M-100 to M-148
No open issues
1. Commercial manager
13 Oct, 16:20
Approved
2. Head of procurement
Waiting
Approve and award

Enterprise

The recommendation goes for approval.

The award recommendation goes to named approvers in the order you set. Open design-review issues pinned on the drawings can hold an award. Here there are none.

Award: Tower B, MEP works Awarded
1. Commercial manager
13 Oct, 16:20
Approved
2. Head of procurement
14 Oct, 16:05
Approved
Awarded
By the final approval
Bidder 2, 4.18m
Award letter.pdf Issued 14 Oct, 16:05

Enterprise

The final approval makes the award.

When the last approver approves, the award is made: there's no second step for someone to forget. The award letter goes to Bidder 2.

Tower B, MEP works Awarded
Prequalified 6 invited from the MEP approved list
Issued 2 of 2 approvals, 14 Sep 14:02
Clarified Addendum 2, Rev C acknowledged 6 of 6
Bid 5 of 6, sealed until the opening
Opened 12 Oct, 10:00:00, technical locked first
Compared Line by line, exported to Excel
Evaluated Bidder 2 leads at 88.4
Awarded Bidder 2, 4.18m, 14 Oct 16:05
Every view, download, score and decision, time-stamped.

One package, one record.

From the approved list to the award letter, every view, download, score and decision is time-stamped on one record. Bring a package of your own and we'll walk it through ProTenders with you.

  • Approval workflows are on the Enterprise plan; award letters with dual sign-off start on Pro.
  • Design review: issues are pinned to the exact spot on a drawing, and your consultants and team resolve them in one workspace.
  • Read tenders, bids, awards and evaluations through the API (Pro); webhooks tell your systems when they change (Enterprise).
  • Guided setup is included: your suppliers, templates and approval rules are brought in, and we run the first package with you.